Liquid Staking Explained: How to Earn Yields Without Locking Assets

How liquid staking works

Liquid staking is a mechanism that allows you to earn staking rewards while keeping your assets usable. Unlike native staking, where coins are locked to secure the network, liquid staking issues a derivative token representing your staked position. This derivative, often called a liquid staking token (LST), can be traded, sold, or used as collateral in decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols while the underlying asset continues to generate yield.

The process begins when you deposit your cryptocurrency into a liquid staking protocol. The protocol aggregates these deposits and delegates them to validators on a proof-of-stake (PoS) network, such as Ethereum. As the validators secure the network and process transactions, they earn rewards. These rewards are distributed back to the protocol and reflected in the value of the derivative token you hold. Essentially, the derivative token acts as a receipt for your staked assets, appreciating in value relative to the original coin as rewards accrue.

This structure solves the liquidity trap of traditional staking. In native staking, your assets are locked for a set period, making them inaccessible for other investments. With liquid staking, you maintain exposure to the underlying asset’s price movements and staking yields, but you also retain the flexibility to deploy your derivative token elsewhere. For example, you could supply your LST as collateral to borrow other assets or provide liquidity in a trading pair, effectively earning yield on yield.

Native Staking vs. Liquid Staking

Native staking and liquid staking both secure proof-of-stake networks, but they handle your assets differently. The core distinction lies in liquidity. Native staking locks your tokens directly with a validator, while liquid staking issues a derivative token that represents your staked position.

This difference creates a trade-off between simplicity and flexibility. Native staking is straightforward but ties up capital. Liquid staking adds complexity but unlocks the ability to use your staked assets elsewhere in the decentralized finance ecosystem.

Liquidity and Lock-up Periods

With native staking, you delegate your tokens to a validator. Your assets remain locked for a specific period, often ranging from days to weeks, before you can withdraw them. During this time, you cannot trade or use the tokens for other purposes. This illiquidity is the primary cost of direct participation.

Liquid staking solves this by issuing a receipt token, such as stETH or rETH, back to you immediately. This token tracks the value of your staked assets plus accrued rewards. You can trade, lend, or swap this receipt token on exchanges or in DeFi protocols while your underlying assets continue to earn staking yields.

Yield Sources and Risk

Both methods earn rewards from block validation, but the risk profiles differ. Native staking carries validator-specific risk. If the validator you chose performs poorly or acts maliciously, you may face slashing penalties. You are also responsible for choosing a reliable operator.

Liquid staking protocols often use pooled validators to distribute risk, but they introduce smart contract risk. The code managing the derivative tokens and the underlying staking mechanism can contain vulnerabilities. Additionally, liquid staking derivatives often trade at a discount or premium to their underlying asset, adding market volatility to your yield.

Use Cases

Native staking suits long-term holders who want maximum yield with minimal fees and don't need immediate access to their capital. It is ideal for those comfortable with direct validator management.

Liquid staking benefits active traders and DeFi users who want to earn yield without sacrificing liquidity. It allows you to leverage your staked assets for borrowing, lending, or providing liquidity in other protocols, effectively earning double yields.

Top liquid staking protocols

Liquid staking protocols dominate the Ethereum ecosystem by allowing users to earn staking rewards while retaining liquidity. Instead of locking assets in a vault, these platforms issue a derivative token—such as stETH or rETH—that represents the staked position. This derivative can be used in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications to generate additional yield on top of the base staking reward.

The market is currently led by a few established protocols, each with distinct security models and fee structures. Understanding the differences between the leading options helps investors balance yield potential against security risks.

Lido (stETH)

Lido is the largest liquid staking protocol by total value locked, offering the deepest liquidity in the market. It uses a decentralized network of node operators to secure the Ethereum network, distributing risk across many validators. Lido charges a 10% fee on staking rewards, which is split between the protocol treasury and node operators. Its primary token, stETH, is widely accepted across DeFi platforms, making it the most versatile option for users who need to deploy their staked assets immediately.

Rocket Pool (rETH)

Rocket Pool operates as a decentralized protocol with a lower barrier to entry for node operators. It requires a smaller amount of ETH to run a node, which encourages broader participation and decentralization. Rocket Pool charges a 5% fee on rewards, significantly lower than Lido’s. The protocol’s native token, rETH, appreciates in value relative to ETH as rewards accrue, rather than being distributed as separate tokens. This model appeals to investors who prefer a simpler, self-custodial approach to liquid staking.

Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH (cbETH)

Coinbase offers cbETH as a streamlined option for users already engaged with the Coinbase ecosystem. The protocol is custodial, meaning Coinbase manages the node infrastructure, which simplifies the user experience but introduces centralization risks. cbETH is integrated directly into Coinbase’s trading and lending products, allowing users to borrow against their staked assets or trade them within the platform. While convenient, this option lacks the broader DeFi compatibility of Lido or Rocket Pool, limiting its utility outside of Coinbase’s walled garden.

Risks and tradeoffs to consider

Liquid staking offers yield, but it introduces complexity that native staking avoids. When you stake directly, you lock assets with a single validator. With liquid staking, you interact with a protocol that mints a derivative token. This introduces a layer of smart contract risk that does not exist in direct staking.

The most significant market risk is de-pegging. Liquid staking tokens (LSTs) are supposed to track the price of the underlying asset plus staking rewards. However, during market stress, liquidity can dry up, causing the LST to trade at a discount. For example, in 2022, Lido’s stETH briefly traded below the price of ETH. If you need to exit your position during a panic, you may sell at a loss. This is a tradeoff for the liquidity native staking does not provide.

Regulatory uncertainty adds another layer of risk. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has signaled that some staking services may be considered securities offerings. While liquid staking protocols are decentralized, the legal landscape remains unclear. A regulatory crackdown could impact the availability or legality of certain LSTs in specific jurisdictions. Always stay informed about local regulations before committing capital.

The choice between native and liquid staking is not just about yield. It is about risk tolerance. Liquid staking gives you flexibility, but you are paying for that flexibility with exposure to smart contract bugs, de-pegging events, and regulatory shifts. For many, the risk is worth the yield. For others, the simplicity and safety of native staking is preferable.

Frequently asked: what to check next